SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Ashapurna Buildcon Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shiv Vyas, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against order dated 30.09.2020 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (for short “State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 1304/2019.

2. Case of the Complainant/Respondent is that he entered into an agreement dated 05.03.15 with the Opposite Party/Petitioner for construction on Plot No. 308 under the scheme “Ashapurna Nano Grand Project” for Rs.14,14,577/-. The Opposite Party gave a proposal for construction of Residential House in village Kharda Randhir, Shikargarh, Jodhpur at Khasra No. 19, 19/1, 19/2 and 19/3 and 31, 30/3, 30/4 and 30/7. The Complainant accepted the proposal for which the agreement was made on 05.03.2015. According to the agreement the construction area was 735 sq. feet on total area of Plot No. 308 of 111.11 sq. yards.

3. The booking was done on 18.03.2015 and booking amount of Rs.11,000/- was deposited through Receipt No. 1524 at the same time and later Rs.3,10,000/- was paid on 13.04.2015. Further, Rs.1,50,000/- was paid on 17.04.2015 and Rs.8,00,000/- was paid on 20.04.2015 through cheque by the Respondent. Total amount of Rs.12,7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top