SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Mili Jain – Appellant
Versus
Wave City Centre Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Jalaj Agarwal, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Ms. Shreya Nair, Advocate

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”) against M/s. Wave Mega City Centre Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Developer”), seeking the following reliefs:

1. “Direct the Opposite Party to deliver the possession of the flat i.e. Apartment No. 1603, having super area of 1548.63 sq. feet (approx. 143.87 sq. meter) on the 16th Floor of Block No. 2B, Block Name-Amore, Tower No. A, Serviced Residence No. 03, Noida along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the delay of the delivery of the flat till the final adjudication/ realization of the case and along with pendent lite and future interest at the same rate or such higher rate which this Hon’ble Commission may deemed fit in the interest of justice.

And/Or

2. Direct the Opposite Party to pay a sum of Rs.1,04,98,248/- (Rupees One Crore Four Lakh Ninety Eight Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Eight Only) along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of deposit till the final adjudication of the case and along with pendent lite and future interest at the same rate or such higher rate which this Hon’ble C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top