SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Bhagat Cars Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Arshjot Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Narender Singh Yadav, Advocate

ORDER

This Appeal Execution is directed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission) dated 10.08.2021 in EA/76/2021, whereby the State Commission issued direction to the District Magistrate, Gurgaon to attach the office of Judgment Debtors Nos.1, 2 & 3 and appoint a receiver to prepare an inventory of all articles lying in their offices and take them into possession forthwith. The State Commission also directed the Judgment Debtors to comply with the order under execution and pay the decretal amount alongwith upto date interest to the decree holders by way of demand draft before the next date of hearing.

2. The State Commission, vide order dated 31.03.2021 in CC/282/2019 directed the Opposite Parties/Judgment Debtors as under: -

Opposite parties no.1 and 2 are directed to repair the vehicle in question and replace the defective parts of the engine or the component, if any, or if required to replace the defective engine with a brand new engine of the same specifications, with fresh warranty thereon, without charging anything from the complainant and make the vehicle in a perfect roadworthy condition, an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top