SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Nameesh Miglani – Appellant
Versus
JDM Promoters Ltd. through its CEO Sunil Bedi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Pradeep Solath, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ajit Singh Thakur, Advocate

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Appeal Execution has been filed by Mr. Nameesh Miglani (hereinafter referred to as Appellant/Complainant/Decree Holder) against the Order dated 21.03.2018 passed by the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as State Commission), whereby the Decree Holder was directed to deposit the price of the flat, i.e., Rs.32,81,250/- alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from October 15th, 2009 till actual payment, within three months from the date of receipt of that Order and after receipt of the payment, the M/s. JMD Promoters Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent/Judgment Debtor) was directed to handover the possession of the flat within three months.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Appellant/Complainant was allotted a Flat for Rs.32,81,250/- by the Opposite Party/Judgment Debtor. As per terms of the Buyer’s Agreement, which was executed between the Parties on 22.07.2006, the possession of the flat was proposed to be delivered within a period of three and a half years from the date of sanction of building plans. The Decree Holder paid Rs.17,75,000/- to the Judgment Debtor from time to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top