SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Branch Manager, OSL Hyundai – Appellant
Versus
Ruparanjan Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajnish Sinha, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Mr. Rajnish Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner.

2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odisha, dated 18.02.2021, passed in First Appeal No. 367 of 2015 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Puri, dated 30.05.2015, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 275 of 2013), by which the District Forum has allowed the complaint and directed opposite parties No.1,2 & 4 to repair the vehicle as per the repair estimate dated 3.8.2013 and dated 16.11.2014 of Aditya Car Care Pvt. Ltd, opposite party No.4 free of cost and deliver the vehicle in perfect running condition within two months and pay compensatory interest @12% per annum on the cost of the vehicle of Rs.10,08,294/- from 3.8.2013 till it is repaired. If opposite parties failed to comply with the directions above within stipulated period, then the interest was enhanced @18% per annum and cost of Rs.5,000/- has been awarded. The Appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

3. Ruparanjan Das (Respondent No.1) filed CC No.275 of 2013 for directing opposite parties No.1 to 4 for payment of Rs.13 lakhs as compensation along with interest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top