SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Prakash Ranjan, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Joy Dip Bhattacharya, Advocate

ORDER

R. K. Agrawal, President.—Delay condoned.

2. Challenge in this First Appeal is to the Order dated 20th January, 2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Circuit Bench at Nagpur (for short, “the State Commission”) in Complaint Case No. 14 of 2012 whereby the Complaint filed by the Complainant/Appellant herein, was dismissed holding that there was no deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties/Respondents herein in repudiating the claim preferred by the Complainant.

3. Concisely put, the facts leading to the filing of the Complaint before the State Commission are that the Husband of the Complainant (for short, the “Deceased”), during his life time, had obtained two Insurance Policies from the Opposite Party No.1, namely, HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Ltd. (for short, the “Insurance Company”) bearing No.12992586 on 30.06.2009 with assured sum of Rs.12,50,000/- and HDFC Term Assurance Policy bearing No.13006145 dated 25.08.2009 with assured sum of Rs.75,00,000/-. During the validity of the said Policies, the Deceased w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top