SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVA
Shashi Bhushan – Appellant
Versus
T. D. I. Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Amit Saini, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Ankit Khera, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President.—The present complaint being filed under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Shri Shashi Bhushan (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’) against T.D.I. Infrastructure Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘opposite party’) and has prayed the following reliefs:-

“Direct the OP to refund the amount of Rs. 22,41,411/- i.e. payment paid by complainant, alongwith Rs. 1,00,000/- towards mental torture and harassment and legal expenses and 18% as interest from the date of deposit on the principal amount from the date of deposit of amount, till its realization, in the interest of justice.

Any other and further relief which this Hon’ble Forum may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case be passed in favour of the complainant and against the respondents.”

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that the complainant booked a flat i.e. T-5/1304 (Duplex) in the project of Opposite Party named “KTH Duplex Tuscan Heights” at Kundly Sonepat, Haryana. The Apartment Buyer Agreement was executed between the parties on 07.06.2012. The opposite party assured the complainant that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top