SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DIPA SEN (MAITY), SHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH
Sumitra Sen – Appellant
Versus
Solace Management Consultancy Services (P) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Amarnath Sanyal, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties: None

JUDGMENT

Shyamal Kumar Ghosh, Member.—The instant consumer case has been filed by the complainant against the opposite-parties praying for delivery of possession, execution and registration of the deed of conveyance, alternatively refund of amount of Rs. 14,52,050/- along with interest, compensation and cost.

2. The brief fact of the case is that complainant is an old aged widow and issueless. The complainant intended to purchase a flat measuring area about 900 sft. In this regard the complainant approached the op no – 1/ developer and the developer company assured the complainant to arrange a flat under the project viz. ‘Mayer Bari’. The total consideration amount has been fixed for Rs. 20,73,500/-. The complainant has paid advance amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- to the op developer. To that effect an agreement for sale dated 19/03/2014 has been executed between the parties. The complainant paid Rs 14,52,050/- (including Rs. 8,00,000/- towards an advance) to the op/developer on different dates. The op/developer promised to complete the said project viz. ‘Mayer Bari’ within time and h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top