ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—This First Appeal, filed by the Legal Heirs of the original Complainant, namely, Saroj Singla (for short “the Patient”), under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the Order dated 04.06.2010, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (for short “the State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 41 of 2007. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the Complaint.

2. Succinctly put, the material facts giving rise to the filing of the present Appeal, as culled out from the Complaint, are that on 18.03.2007 the Patient was admitted in the Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (for short “the Hospital”) for treatment of infection in urinary tract and pus in the renal pelvis. Initially, she was admitted in Hero Heart Branch of the Hospital, where she was operated on 25/26.03.2007 and the right PCNL was done. On 27.03.2007, she was shifted to the Hospital and nephrostomy drain was also put in her kidney. A sum of Rs.65,000/- was paid for treatment of the Patient at the Hero Heart Branch of the Hospital. As the Patient had low platelet count, she was transfused 2-3 bottles of P