ORDER

M.A. No. 295 of 2021 in R.P. No. 4512 of 2012

1. The miscellaneous application no. 295 of 2021 seeks recall of this Commission’s Order dated 02.11.2021 vide which the revision petition no. 4512 of 2012 was dismissed for lack of prosecution.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the relevant material including inter alia the Order dated 02.11.2021 and the miscellaneous application no 295 of 2021.

3. For ready reference the Order of 02.11.2021 is reproduced below:

Dated: 02nd November 2021

ORDER

Taken up through video conferencing.

1. Called out several times. No one appears for the petitioner, who was the opposite party no. 2 before the District Commission.

The respondent no. 1, who was the complainant before the District Commission, is present in person.

The respondents no. 2 and no. 3, who were the opposite parties no. 1 and no. 3 before the District Commission, are ex parte vide Order dated 18.12.2014.

2. This revision has been filed under section 21(b) of the Act 1986 in challenge to the Order dated 25.07.2012 of the State Commission in appeal no. 812 of 2012 arising out of the Order dated 25.05.2012 of the District Commission in complaint