R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Vijay Purushottam Kale – Appellant
Versus
Hetali Enterprises, Builders & Developers – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member.—These three Consumer Complaints have been filed by Dr. Vijay Purushottam Kale, Dr. Purushottam Gopalrao Kale and Dr. Satishchandra Purushottam Kale (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Complainants”) under Section 21 (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”) against M/s Hetali Enterprises, Builders & Developers (Opposite Party No. 1) and Andheri Nav Bahar CHS (Opposite Party No. 2/ the Society) at Vile Parle, seeking compensation towards the alleged deficiency, unfair trade practice and delayed possession of their flats under redevelopment plan.
2. Since the facts of the cases and the Opposite Parties are same, these Complaints are being disposed of by this common Order.
3. The Complainants were residing at “Nav Bahar” building in Vile Parle. Their Society named Andheri Nav Bahar Co-op Housing Society (hereinafter referred to as the “Opposite Party No. 2) invited bids from various builders/developers to entrust the redevelopment work (demolition and new construction) of the existing buildings ‘Nav Bahar’ at Lallu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.