SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR
Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences – Appellant
Versus
S. Ramakrishna Through LRs. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Nemo
For the Respondents:Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, Advocate

ORDER

IMPORTANT POINT

(1) Coronary Angiography — Purpose of coronary angiography is to know the coronary anatomy and the degree of luminal obstruction of the coronary arteries.

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member.—

The concept of interventional cardiology should expand beyond mechanical revascularization to encompass preventive interventions that forestall future events. There is need for uniform reporting system for Angiography reports to avoid confusion and unwanted litigations.

1. The Petitioner Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences filed this Revision Petition under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned Order dated 17.01.2011, passed by the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 1125/2008, wherein the appeal was allowed and the Petitioner as well as the Respondent No. 2 (Dr. Anil Kumar) were directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,95,969/- together with compensation of Rs.25,000/- towards mental agony and costs of Rs.5000/- to the Complainant/Respondent-1).

2. The brief facts are that on 11.02.2004, the Complainant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘patient’)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top