SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL
Atul Kaila – Appellant
Versus
Parsvnath Developers Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Anshu Mahajan and Mr. Vikas Aggarwal, Advocates
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by Atul Kaila and her wife Bharti Kaila (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against Opposite Party, M/s. Parsvnath Developers Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Developer), seeking refund of the amount paid towards purchase of Flat alongwith interest and costs as the Opposite Party Developer failed to hand-over the possession of the Flat booked by them in the Project launched by the Developer in the name and style of “Parsvnath Privilege” located at Plot No. 11, Section Pi, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

2. It has been averred in the Complaint that the Opposite Party Developer launched a Residential Group Housing Project in the name and style of ‘Parsvnath Privilege’ located at Plot No. 11, Sector Pi (Chorosia Estate), Greater Noida, UP. The Complainants booked a residential flat in the said Project in the year 2008. Flat No. T14-303, Tower No. 14 admeasuring 1855 sq. ft. was allotted to them at a basic sale price of Rs.61,21,500/-. Flat Buyers Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement) was executed between

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top