SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sanjiv Mahendru – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Ms. Shreya Sircar, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjiv Mahendru, In person

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 04.02.2019 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter to be referred to as “State Commission”), whereby the Complaint filed by the Complainant was partly allowed and the Appellant Company was directed to hand over the possession of Flat No. 004 consisting of 3 BHK small, admeasuring 107.77 sq. mtr., Ground Floor, Block No. B-II-5, Sector A-5, East Facing door, corner Flat, ground floor facing park with open car parking space no. 619 in the project, New Haven, to the Complainant within a period of two months from the date of the order, along with Rs.25,000/- as cost and pay interest to the Complainant at the rate of 9% per annum on the amount of Rs.22,25,000/- from 01.07.2012 till handing over the possession of the Flat.

2. Brief facts of the case as narrated in the Complaint are that the Sanjiv Mahendru (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) had booked a residential flat (3BHK Small) on Ground Floor in the project “New Haven” proposed to be constructed by Tata Housing Development Company (hereinafter refer to as Opposite Party/Appellant) at Mumbai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top