SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Shivalik Container Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Sakal Bhushan, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Abhishek Gola, Advocate

ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—In the present complaint, the complainant has alleged that it is a registered company since 1997 who is engaged in the manufacture, supply and sale of corrugated boxes / boards to various industrial houses and was having its factory in five sheds. Out of five sheds, four were installed with machinery for manufacture of the card boxes and fifth shed was used for storage of raw material with semi finished goods / excess stocks. The complainant had been taking regular insurance covers for buildings, machinery and stock of raw material and semi finished and finished goods from the very inception and for the relevant period, it were having two valid insurance policies. It is submitted that insurance policy No. 261700/11/2011/194 was covering the following items:

i

Stock

Rs.1,50,00,000.00

ii

Plant & Machinery

Rs.30,00,000.00

Iii

Building

Rs.25,00,000.00

 

Total

Rs.2,05,00,000.00

Policy No.261700/11/2011/211 was covering the following items:

 

i

Stock

Rs.1,42,00,000.00

Ii

Plant & Machinery

Rs.2,50,00,000.00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top