SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Promod Balakrishna Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Patel Engineering Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

Complainants are husband and wife. The Opposite Parties are Builders and Promoters of the Residential Project in the name and style “Townsville” at Newtown, Bangalore South. Opposite Party No.2 is subsidiary of Opposite Party No.1. Opposite Party No.2 was later merged with Opposite Party No.1. Opposite Party No.3 entered into Joint Development agreement with the Opposite Party No.1 for the completion of the aforesaid project.

2. The case of Complainants is that they booked a residential unit in the “Townsville” project, Newtown, Bangalore South by depositing a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-. The Complainants were allotted unit No.8A, 3.5 BHK-Garden, vide allotment letter dated 22.06.2011. The project was to be constructed on the land in Hulimangala Village, Jigani Hobli, with a saleable area of 3424 sq. feet, inclusive of proportionate share in common areas with two closed car parks. Opposite Party No.2 issued demand note dated 29.09.2011 for a sum of Rs.14,76,680/- towards payment of instalment. On 10.01.2012, builder-buyer agreement was executed between the Complainants and Oppos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top