SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Rohit Jain – Appellant
Versus
Parsvnath Developers Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate

ORDER

The present case is filed under Section 21(a) (1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2. The case of the Complainant is that on 01.05.2006, he booked a three bedroom flat measuring 1855 sq. ft. in “Parsvnath Privilege” project with the Opposite Party, for a consideration of Rs.52,86,750/- and paid an advance of Rs.3,00,000/-. On 01.05.2006, he further paid a sum of Rs.7,00,000/-. In April 2007, the Opposite Party informed the Complainant that he has been allotted Flat No.T12-301. Thereafter, the Complainant deposited the amount as per following details: -

Sl.  No.

Amount

Date

1.

Rs. 3,21,687/-

06.04.2007

2

Rs.5,76,906/-

10.12.2007

3

Rs.4,70,072/-

04.04.2008

4

Rs.4,70,072.50/-

05.07.2008

In May 2007, the Flat Buyer Agreement was executed. According to the Agreement, the construction of the flat was to be completed within 36 months. The Complainant visited the Construction site and found that the Opposite Party had stopped the construction of Tower No.12 after basement roof slab. He also found that the Opposite Party was not granted the license/sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top