SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajveer Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate
For the Respondent: Nemo

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners against order dated 02.01.2019 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.1024 of 2018.

2. The case of the Complainant/Respondent is that on 11.09.2017 he applied for a domestic electricity connection for his residential house and submitted all relevant documents and fee of Rs.200/-. The Opposite Parties sent demand notice dated 27.09.2017 for Rs.18,471/- to the Complainant on the ground that the house of the Complainant was situated in non-abadi area. On receiving the demand notice, the Complainant visited the office of Opposite Parties and informed them that his residential accommodation was situated in abadi area. The Complainant did not receive any satisfactory reply from the Opposite Parties. The Complainant also sent a letter dated 19.11.2017 to the Opposite Parties requesting them to issue correct demand notice as per Rules and Regulations and provide the electricity connection, but the Opposite Parties did not give any reply to the Complainant. On 20.11.2017, the Complainant again visited the office of the Opposite Party and requested

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top