RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Himanshu Trading Co. – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mr. Mohit Singh, Advocate, for the appellant and Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate, for respondent-1.
2. Himanshu Trading Company (the complainant) has filed the present appeal from the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, dated 07.11.2007, dismissing Consumer Complaint No.4 of 2007, filed by the complainant.
3.Himanshu Trading Company filed Consumer Complaint No.4 of 2007, for directing The New India Assurance Company Ltd. (the Insurer) to pay (i) insurance claim of Rs.6962000/- with interest @18% per annum, from the date of the loss till its actual payment, (ii) all the dues of Canara Bank on the complainant, (iii) Rs.5/- lacs as the compensation for mental agony and physical harassment, (iv) Rs.50000/- as the cost of litigation and (v) any other relief which may be deemed fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case.
4.The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with the complaint, are as follows:-
(a) Himanshu Trading Company (the Insured) was a sole proprietorship concern and trading in distribution of soft drinks of Coca Cola brand, soda water and mineral
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.