SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR, BINOY KUMAR
Sachin Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Sultan Mohd. Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lav Kumar Agrawal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ritesh Khare, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member.—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Act 1986 in challenge to the Order dated 15.09.2016 of the State Commission in Appeal No. 2519 of 2015 arising out of the Order dated 10.11.2015 of the District Commission in complaint no. 4 of 2015.

2. Brief facts are that on 10.02.2014 the Complainant underwent right eye cataract operation in Dr. Sharma Prasad Mukherjee (Civil) Hospital, Lucknow. And advised to take Tab. Wysolone 20 mg. Thereafter, he had pain in the operated eye and consulted Dr. Sachin Tyagi-the Petitioner on 20.03.2014. He diagnosed it as scleral melt disease and prescribed medicines viz. Levobact-eye drop; Soft Drop- eye drop; Panthegel-eye ointment & Saiclodase-Tablet for pain (SOS). Again on 22.03.2014, the Complainant visited the Petitioner wherein it was diagnosed as “Hypopyon” of the operated eye. He changed the medicines to Microflox 1000 mg-Tablet; Moxicipe-eye drop; Fortified Tombramycin-eye drop; Atrocin-ointment. The Complainant again visited the hospital of the Petitioner on 31.03.2014, advised one injection Tramasure. As there was no recovery, on 03.04.2014 the Petitioner referred the Compla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top