R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rajeev Jain – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member.—This Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner / Complainant under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the Order dated 19.12.2019 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), which allowed the Appeal and set aside the Order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (hereinafter referred to as the ‘District Forum’) and consequently dismissed the Complaint.
2. Briefly stated the facts are that on 10.04.2010, the Complainant Rajkumar injured his left leg in the road accident. He was examined and was treated by an Orthopedician, Dr. Rajeev Jain (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Opposite Party No. 1’) at Dr. Narender Memorial Murti Nursing Home at Baraut and then he was operated on 17.04.2010. The Complainant did not get relief. It was alleged that the plates fixed in the leg were not set properly. Therefore, on 9.11.2010, another operation was conducted by the Opposite Party No. 1, even then there was no cure. Thereafter, the Opposite Party No. 1 refused to treat the patient further. Therefore, 3rd operation was done by Dr. Tomar at Raksha Hospital in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.