R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Dilip Sagun Naik – Appellant
Versus
Maliyil Cheriyan Mathai – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member.—The instant Appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned Order dated 03.02.2020, passed by the Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”), wherein the complaint was partly allowed and the Appellant was directed to execute the sale deed, pay to Respondent a sum of Rs. 2,05,000/- and Rs. 25,000/- towards costs to the Respondent.
2. For the convenience, the Parties would be referred to the positions they held in the Consumer Complaint No. 28 of 2018 before the State Commission.
3. Brief facts are that on 03.05.2007, an Agreement was entered into between the Complainant and D. S. Naik Associates (hereinafter referred to as the “Opposite Party”) to construct Bungalow No. A-14 measuring about 151 sq. mtrs at village St. Jose de Areal, Salcete, Goa. Accordingly, the Complainant paid Rs.10,00,000/- as consideration. This Agreement was notarized but not registered before the Sub-Registrar. The Opposite Party handed over possession of the bungalow on 10.06.2013 and Occupancy Certificate on 16.08.2016. As per Clause 26 of the Agreement, the Opposite Part
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.