SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR, BINOY KUMAR
Amit Arora – Appellant
Versus
Vatika Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Soham Goswami, Advocate

ORDER

The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by the Complainants, Shri Amit Arora and Mrs. Kavita Arora against Opposite Party, M/s. Vatika Ltd. (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Developer’) seeking refund of the amount paid by them to the Developer towards purchase of the Residential Apartment along with interest and compensation as the Developer has failed to hand over the possession of the booked Apartment in terms of the Agreement executed between the parties.

2. The facts as narrated in the Complaint are that the Complainants had booked a Residential Apartment to meet their residential requirement in the Project, namely “Tranquil Heights”, (hereinafter to be referred to as the “Project”) proposed to be developed by the Opposite Party Developer at Sector – 82 A, Gurgaon, Haryana, by paying a booking amount of Rs.8,00,000 on 6.11.2013. The total Sale Consideration of the Apartment was Rs.1,49,73,915/- which was to be paid in terms of Construction Linked Plan. Vide Allotment Letter, dated 20.11.2014, the Complainants were allotted Unit No.3803, on the 38th Floor, in Tower No. E having Super Ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top