ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member.—Both the Appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by two doctors (Appellants) against the Order dated 01.10.2013 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Complaint No. 2/2006 whereby the Complaint was partly allowed.

2. For the convenience, all the Parties would be referred to the positions they held in the Consumer Complaint No. 2/2006 filed before the State Commission. The facts are drawn from First Appeal No.840 of 2013.

3. The brief facts are that Mrs. Phooli Devi (hereinafter referred to as the “patient”), wife of Mr. Madan Lal Yadav – Complainant was suffering uterine problems about 1 ½ years. One Dr. Sita Ram Yadav (hereinafter referred to as the “Opposite Party No. 2”) visited the Complainant’s house on 13.03.2005 and insisted to undergo operation at Krishna Hospital at village Khejdoli as the operation would cost much less and cheaper than at Jaipur. Being so convinced, the Complainant admitted his wife in Krishna Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Hospital - Opposite Party No. 1”) and hysterectomy was done