SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVA
Sanjay Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Aura Infrastructure (P) Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President.—The present complaint has been filed by the complainant before this commission alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice by the opposite party and has prayed the following:
a) Set aside the demand of the defendant as demanded vide its letter dated 22-01-12, 09-04-12, 31-05-12.
b) Set aside the cancellation notice dated 01-10-12 of the defendant Company.
c) Direct the defendant to pay below mentioned amount in favour of the complainant:
i. Rs. 14,07,963/ (Rupees Fourteen Lacs seven thousand nine hundred sixty three only) towards interest on account of delay in possession for the period May 2009 till date
ii. Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs) on account of damages
iii. Penditlete interest during the Proceeding
iv. Rs. 50,000/ Fifty thousand or such amount as this Hon’ble Commission may deem fit towards cost and expenses of litigation, in favour of the complainant
v. Pass such other order as this Hon’ble Commission may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
vi. Total Claim Amt. Rs 24,07,963 (Rupees Twenty four lacs seven thousand nine hundred sixty three only).
2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudicati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.