SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.P.CHOUDHURY
Sabita Rani Panda – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:M/s. K.C. Mishra & Assoc., Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. D.P. Choudhury, President.—Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondent.

2. Here is an appeal filed u/s 15 of the erstwhile Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter called the ‘Act’). Parties to this appeal shall be referred to with reference to their respective status before the District Forum.

3. The case of the complainant in nutshell is that the complainant being owner of passenger bus bearing Registration No. OR-07-V-3873 has purchased insurance policy from the OP covering risk from 8.10.2010 to 7.10.2011 on payment of due premium. It is alleged inter alia that on 1.7.2011 at about 4.05 PM the vehicle met accident near village Jilundi Main Road. Thereafter, matter was reported to the OP. Surveyor was deputed to assess the loss. Thereafter, subsequent surveyor was appointed to assess the loss who assessed the loss at Rs.1,17,000/-. Finally, OP repudiated the claim on 1.3.2012 stating that the vehicle has no route permit. So being aggrieved with such deficiency in service, the complaint was filed.

4. OP appeared and filed written version stating that they have received the information and also deputed two surveyors. The second surveyor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top