SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SURJIT SINGH, VIJAY PAL KHACHI
Life Insurance Corporation Of India – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Yogesh Thakur, Advocate

ORDER :

Surjit Singh, President .(Oral)

Appellant has preferred this appeal against the order dated 12.04.2016, of learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solan, whereby a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, filed against it, by respondent, Narinder Kumar, has been allowed and a direction given to it to pay a sum of Rs. 2,35,000/-, with interest at the rate of 9%, per annum, from the date of filing of complaint, to the date of payment of the aforesaid amount of money, on account of double accident benefit, in accordance with condition No. 10 of the insurance policy and also to pay Rs. 25,000/-, as compensation and Rs. 5,000/-, as litigation expenses.

2. Admitted facts are that Shri Shubham Bhatti, aged about 20 years, had purchased a policy on his life from the appellant. In addition to paying premium for the sum assured, which was Rs. 2,35,000/-, he had been paying extra premium for getting double accident benefit, under the policy. As per this double accident benefit clause, in the event of life assured dying an accidental death, in addition to payment of sum assured, i.e. Rs. 2,35,000/-, to his nominee, an additional amount, equivalent to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top