SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUNITA SHARMA, R.K.VERMA
MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
SURESH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Raman Sethi.

ORDER :

1. Present appeal is filed against order dated 05.12.2019 passed by learned District Consumer Commission, Una camp at Hamirpur in Consumer Complaint No. 114/2017 titled Suresh Kumar Versus Managing Director M.S Competent Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Brief facts of consumer complaint:

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant is owner of vehicle bearing No. HP-84-1330, which was duly insured with opposite party No.2. It is pleaded that vehicle suffered damages during the cloud burst on 06-08-2017. Complainant handed over the vehicle for necessary repair to opposite party No. 1 which is authorised service station. It is averred that Opposite party No.1 not repaired the vehicle properly and kept it in the workshop w.e.f. 09-08-2017 to 15-09-2017. Thereafter, complainant issued legal notice to opposite party No.1. Then opposite party No.1 handed over the vehicle and charged Rs. 19,605/- and Rs. 1,000/- as insurance charges. Complainant has taken cashless policy of the Maruti and opposite party No. 1 is also authorised service station so charging of amount for repair is deficiency in service on behalf of opposite parties and also unfair trade practice. With these averments

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top