SURJIT SINGH, PREM CHAUHAN
TAPAN KANTI DHAR – Appellant
Versus
TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION LIMITED – Respondent
ORDER :
SURJIT SINGH, J.
1. Appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 28.9.2013, of learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solan, whereby his complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which he filed against the respondents, has been dismissed.
2. Appellant purchased an insurance policy from the respondents in July, 2007 and paid a premium of Rs. 50,000 up to 4.8.2008. According to the appellant; his name, his nominees name, his occupation and his address mentioned in the policy, were incorrect and also his signature on the proposal form and documents annexed thereto, were forged. He wrote to the respondents on 10.7.2008, 25.7.2008, 2.8.2008 and 4.8.2008, about the errors/mistakes; about his name, his nominees name, his address, his occupation, as also his signature, being forged on the proposal form, and some documents, but there was no response. So, he requested the respondents to cancel the policy and refund the entire money paid by him. Respondents refunded only a sum of Rs. 25,000, out of the amount of Rs. 50,000 and illegally withheld a sum of Rs. 25,000. So, he prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondents to refund the remaining amo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.