SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL
Mamta Maurya – Appellant
Versus
Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Sonam Sharma, Mr. Arjun Rekhi and Mr. Shashwat Tripathi, Advocates
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sumeet Sharma and Mr. Tenzen Negi, Advocates

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act) by the Complainants/Allottees of the Units in the Residential Housing Project under the name and style “The Kove” located at Jay Pee green Sports City, Sector 25, Yamuna Expressway Industrial Authority Area, Dankaur, District Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter to be referred as the Project), by Opposite Party Jaiprakash Associates Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the OP Developer), inter alia, alleging deficiency in service in not handing over the possession of the Units within stipulated period and seeking either possession with delayed compensation or refund of amount deposited by them along with reasonable interest and compensation.

2. Since the interest of the Complainants and other Unit buyers in the aforesaid Project is the same and identical reliefs have been claimed on behalf of all the Complainants, IA No. 2155 / 2017, an Application under Section 12(1)(c) of the Act has also

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top