R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR, BINOY KUMAR
Appeared at the time of arguments through video conferencing Rachna Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Dayanand Medical College & Hospital – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member.—The instant Appeal has been filed by the Appellants — Complainants against the Order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 101/2014, wherein the Complaint was dismissed.
2. Briefly stated facts are that a Civil Contractor, Mr. Sanchit Khosla (since deceased, hereinafter referred to as the “Patient”) was a healthy person except having occasional minor psychiatric problems for 7 to 8 years. On 24.01.2011, he consulted one senior psychiatrist, Dr. Rupesh Chaudhari, (hereinafter referred to as the “Opposite Party No. 2”) at Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana (hereinafter referred to as “DMC/Opposite Party No. 1”) for routine check-up. After examination, he advised the patient for admission in the hospital, but the patient and his attendants were reluctant for hospitalisation. However, because of pressure and derogatory words used by the Opposite Party No. 2, the patient was admitted in the psychiatric ward at DMC on 01.02.2011. The routine blood tests and ECG were found to be normal. It was alleged that though the condition of the pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.