SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL
Sangeeta Singh – Appellant
Versus
IFB Industries Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: In person
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2: Mr. Satish Kumar, Account Officer

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—Challenge in this Revision Petition, under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), by the Petitioner/Complainant, is to the Order dated 03.10.2018, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 21/2016. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission reversing the Order dated 10.12.2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sheikh Sarai, Delhi (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint No. 237/2013, has allowed the Appeal filed by the Opposite Party/Respondent herein and dismissed the Complaint of the Petitioner.

2. Succinctly put, the facts giving rise to the present Revision Petition, as culled out from the Complaint, are that the Complainant purchased a Dishwasher Neptune Dx Machine manufactured by the Opposite Party No.1 from Opposite Party No.2 for 28,000/- on 12.01.2012, having extended warranty of 2 years from 12.01.2012 to 12.01.2014. Complainant also incurred a sum of 2,482/- for purchasing additional extended warranty for 2 years from 12.01.2014 to 11.01.2016. The said Dishwasher was delivered and installed at Comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top