SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, BINOY KUMAR
Pearl Khan – Appellant
Versus
Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Deepak Kr. Khushalani, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Aarush Bhatia and Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Advocates

ORDER

1. The present batch of Consumer Complaints has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by the Complainants against the Opposite Parties (hereinafter referred to as the “Developer”) for refunding of amount deposited by them as the Developer failed to handover the possession of the Flats booked by them in the Project launched by the Developer under the name and style of “The Corridors “, within stipulated period as promised.

2. Since the facts and question of law involved in these Complaints are similar except for minor variations in the dates and events and Flat numbers, these Complaints are being disposed of by this Common Order. However, for the sake of convenience, Consumer Complaint No. 1666 of 2018 is treated as the lead case and the facts enumerated hereinafter have been taken from Consumer Complaint No. 1666 of 2018.

3. According to the Complainant, the facts of the case are that in response to the Applications invited by the Opposite Party Developer for allotment of Flats in their upcoming Project, “The Corridor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top