ORDER

Heard Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Gunjan Kumar, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Gaurav Bhatiya, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Aditya Shankar Prasad, for Opposite Party-4 and Mr. Pradeep Mishra, Advocate, for Opposite Parties-1,2,3 and 5. Although Supreme Court has directed for disposal of interim application but both the Parties agreed to argue on the merit in the complaint.

2. This complaint has been filed for setting aside (i) Electricity bills cum notice for the period of 27.03.2009 to 26.04.2009 (Annexure-C-14), dated 21.08.2009, 03.06.2011, 03.09.2011, 16.02.2012 and 05.03.2012 (Annexures-C-23, C-27, C-34, C-46, C-50-A) and letters dated 04.08.2009, 04.08.2011, 17.08.2009, 05.03.2012 (Annexures-C-20, C-31, C-22, C-48), Audit Report (Annexure-C-42) and orders dated 16.01.2012 and 31.01.2012 (Annexures-C-44, C-45) (ii) to direct the opposite parties continue treating the complainant in the category of LMV-1, 2(b)(ii) and sent all future bills accordingly, (iii) to direct the opposite parties to pay compensation of Rs.20/- lacs, for the inconvenience and litigation expenses, (iv) to pay compensation of Rs.20/- lacs for mental agony and (v) any