SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, RAJAN SHARMA
Sanjeev Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Parsvnath Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Rakesh Bhardwaj and T.P. Chauhan, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Dr. Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, (President).—The present Consumer Complaint has been filed before this Commission under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking the following reliefs:

(a) “Direct the Opposite Party to refund sum of Rs. Rs.11,92,854/- (Rupees Eleven Lakh Ninety Two Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Four Only) being the amount deposited by the Complainants with the Opposite Party along with interest @ 24% per annum, with effect from the date of payment made towards the booking amount of the said flat till the date of the actual refund made by the opposite party.

(b) Restrain the Opposite Parties:

(i) from making further illegal demand of money and charging any interest on the illegal demand to the Complainant; and/or;

(ii) from illegally cancellation of the allotment of the booked apartment, and/or;

(iii) from forfeiture of the money paid by the Complainant, and/or;

(c) Direct the Opposite Party to pay Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh) towards mental trauma, harassment and hardships suffered by the Complainants;

(d) Direct the Opposite Party to pay a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Only) to the Complainants towards the cost of litigation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top