SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DIPA SEN (MAITY), AJEYA MATILAL
Janardhan Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Tapas Kumar Ray – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Ms. Tanusree Dhar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Saptarshi Dutta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ajeya Matilal, Judicial Member.—Complainant Janardan Ghosh filed the instant complaint for deficiency in service and adopted unfair trade practice by OPs in respect of rendering service.

2. The case of the Complainant in short is that he is the landowner of the premises no.540, Mahendra Banerjee Road, P.S. Parnasree, Kolkata-700060. The OPs approached to him for entering into a joint venture development agreement for construction of a new building over the premises of the Complainant as per schedule building plan of Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) at the developers’ cost. The Complainant entered into a registered agreement dt.18.02.2013 with OPs developers whereby Complainant entrusted the power to OPs developers to construct and develop a new building over the aforesaid premises. As per the agreement between the parties it was agreed upon that on completion 50% of the construction would belong to the owner’s allocation. It was agreed upon that the developers shall complete the project of construction within 18 months from the date of receipt of the sanctioned plan from KMC which was duly obtained from 12.06.2013. It was also agreed by OPs that they would pay Rs.3500/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top