SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH, RAJ KUMAR PANDEY
North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jagdeo Mandal – Respondent


ORDER

Samarendra Pratap Singh, President.—The instant appeal is directed against the order, dated 26.11.2013 passed by learned District Consumer Forum, Supaul in Complaint Case No.45 of 2012 by which the Opposite parties have been directed to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- to each of the complainants, totaling Rs.75,000/-, within sixty days from the date of order, failing which they would be entitled to take recourse to remedy available under law for recovery of aforesaid amount.

2. A limitation petition has been filed for condonation of delay of almost 7 years 9 months in filing of the appeal. The appellants submit that they were not aware of the impugned order and as soon as they came to learn about the impugned order, dated 26.11.2013, the appeal was filed. In nut shell, appellants’ case is that the appeal was filed without much delay from the date of knowledge and as such the delay is condonable. In support of his submissions, learned counsel has relied upon a decision, dated 5.6.2020 of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd. Vs The Central Bank of India & anr passed in Civil Appeal No.2514 of 2020 (arising out of SLP (c) No.30209/2017). Besides this,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top