ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member—The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Complainant under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) against the impugned Order dated 23.03.2021, passed by the Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 84/2015 filed by the Complainant was dismissed.

2. The facts in brief are that the Complainant, a house wife, Ms. G. Radha, about 47 years of age, underwent hysterectomy operation at Chaitanya Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the ‘OP-2’). It was performed by Dr. Janaki (hereinafter referred to as the ‘OP-1’) on 30.06.2009. It was alleged that the OP-1 performed hysterectomy operation without informed consent. The consent was pre-printed and it amounts to unfair trade practice as held in the judgment of this Commission in C.C.428/2018—Vinod Khanna Vs. R.G. Stone Urology, decided on 06.07.2020. In the midnight of the operated day, the patient was suddenly taken to Gandhi Hospital without explaining the condition of the patient. Thus, it was a case of res ipsa loquitur. The Complainant fur