ORDER

S.T. Barne, Judicial Member—Complainant-Mr.Dilipkumar Bhupatlal Doshi has filed this consumer complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by alleging deficiency in service against opponents. Complainant is consumer. Opponent No.1 is a Proprietary Firm. Opponent No.2 is the Proprietor of opponent No.1. Opponent No.1 is engaged in the business of construction of building and development of plots. Opponent No.3 is the Society which had appointed opponent No.1 for redevelopment of the plot in which the complainant had booked a flat.

2. Facts giving rise to present complaint in short are as under:—

Complainant was searching for residential flat and during search he came to know that opponent No.1 was redeveloping a project named as “Udyam Kunj” at Udaym Kunj CHS Ltd. Off. Rani Sati Marg, Opp. Navjivan School, Navjivan School Road, Malad (East), Mumbai – 400 097. Opponents lured the complainant to purchase a flat bearing No.402 on 4th floor, admeasuring 520 sq.ft. carpet area, ‘A’ wing in the said project for total consideration of Rs.19,50,000/-. Opponent No