SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. K. AGRAWAL, S. M. KANTIKAR
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Nur Hossain – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Deblina Lahiri, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Amitava Bhattacharyya, Advocate

ORDER

Challenge in this Revision Petition by the Petitioner Bank/Opposite Party in the Complaint, is to the order dated 14.3.2018, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, Kolkata (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.A/4/2017. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission while upholding the finding of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Murshidabad at Behrampore (for short “the District Forum”) on merits of the case, has modified its Order dated 04.01.2016 to the extent that the Petitioner shall pay a compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- to the Complainant in lieu of depositing fine @ Rs.50/- per day with the Consumer Legal Aid Account.

2. Facts, giving rise to the filing of the Complaint, are that the Complainant/Respondent herein obtained a loan under Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (for short, “the PMEGP”) from the Petitioner Bank for Mustered Oil and Spices which was subsequently revised to Spices and Atta Chhakki. According to him, the loan amount sanctioned was Rs.5,00,000/- and subsidy was Rs.1,75,000/-. However, the Petitioner Bank disbursed only a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the Complainant, which was not he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top