RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGH
Sanjiv Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Lodha Crown Buildmart Private Limited – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Ms. Anubha Aggarwal, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Rahul Kriplani, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Above complaints have been filed for directing Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. (the opposite party) to (i) handover possession of the apartments, within stipulated period and in no case, later than 30.06.2017; (ii) pay interest @18% per annum, compounded quarterly on the amount deposited by the complainants from the date of deposit till offer of possession; (iii) refund excess amount deposited by the complainants with interest @18% per annum, compounded quarterly from the date of deposit till the date of refund; (iv) consider advance deposit of the complainants under “My Gain” scheme and pay interest on it; (v) withdraw demand letters wherein interest is being charged from the complainants; (vi) pay Rs.2000000/- as punitive damages; (vii) pay Rs.2000000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (viii) pay costs of litigation; and (ix) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case. As the complaints are for similar reliefs against same opposite party as such these complaints are consolidated and decided by
Revajeetu Builder and Developers vs. Narayanaswamy
Pioneer Urban Land Infrastructure vs. Govindan Raghawan
Laxmi Engineering Works vs. P.S.G. Industrial Institute
Lilavati Kitrilal Mehta Medical Trust vs. Unique Shanti Developer
Sunil Kohli vs. Purearth Infrastructure Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.