SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. SUBBIAH, R. VENKATESAPERUMAL
Deepak Abhaya Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: M/s. Genicon Associates

ORDER

R. Subbiah, J.—President.

Aggrieved by the order, dated 11.02.2022, passed in C.C. SR. No.285 of 2021, by the DCDRC, Chennai-South, in returning the Complaint at the SR Stage on the point of pecuniary jurisdiction, the complainant has come up with the present First Appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant/complainant, after taking us through the impugned order that runs to the following effect,

“As per Sec 34 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the amendment Circular G.S.R.912 (E) the District Commission shall have jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as consideration does not exceed Fifty Lakh Rupees. In this case, on perusal of the complaint, it is found that the complainant has paid consideration more than twenty crore rupees. Therefore, this complaint shall be presented before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Hence, the complainant is directed to submit this Complaint before the competent jurisdiction within 45 days from the date of this order. Hence this complaint is returned.”,

submits that the said order of the District Commission is ex facie erroneous for the reason that the loan amount which runs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top