SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PINKI, J. P. AGRAWAL
Anushree Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
Imperia Structure Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants: Lakshmi Narain & Associates
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Arun, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal (President)—The present complaint has been filed by the Complainants before this commission alleging deficiency of service on the part of Opposite Party and has prayed the following reliefs:—

(a) direct the opposite party to refund the aforesaid principal deposit of Rs.19,21,034/- (Rupees Nineteen Lacs twenty one thousand and thirty four Only) which they have received from the complainants by giving them false assurance for providing the flat in their so-called upcoming project, namely, “Mirage Homes, located at GH-F Pocket, Jaypee Green Sports City, SDZ,Sector-25, Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority Area, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar, Utter Pradesh;

(b) direct the opposite party to pay as compensation a sum of Rs. 20.18.872/- (Rupees Twenty Lacs Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Two only) as interest @ 18% per annum, from the date of last deposit and till the date filing of aforesaid complaint;

(c) Direct the opposite party to pay jointly and severely a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakhs Only) as damages to the complainants for harassment, mental

pain, agony, trauma and loss of health

due to the deficiency on services rende

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top