Back
BINOY KUMAR
Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Prabhat Kumar Chaturvedi – Respondent
ORDER
The present Revision Petition under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) has been filed by Petitioners against the Order dated 11.07.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in First Appeal No.104/2012, whereby the Appeal filed by the Petitioners was dismissed and the Order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Udaipur (hereinafter referred to as the “District Forum”) was maintained.
2. Brief facts of the case as per the Complaint are that the Respondent No.1/Complainant was an employee, as on 01.03.1974, in Rajasthan State Industrial & Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. (RIMDC) and was transferred in January, 1976 to another project. The Contributory Provident Fund was not deducted by the Corporation on the ground that these mines are not included in the schedule under Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952. In an Order of the Government of India, dated 14.01.1977, it was clarified that all mining units fall under the Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952. In 1979, the Complainant was assigned to Rajasthan State Mineral Developmen
Right to Get Redressal - Respondent No.1/Complainant has a right to get redressal in this Commission for deficiency on the party of the Petitioners, who had denied him the pensionary benefit for cert....
(1) Revisional jurisdiction - where two interpretation of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisd....
Jurisdictional error - Revisional Jurisdiction of National Commission under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is extremely limited and this Commission cannot set aside the Order pass....
Jurisdictional error - Revisional Jurisdiction of National Commission under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is extremely limited and this Commission cannot set aside the Order pass....
Jurisdictional error - Commission cannot set aside the Order passed by the State Commission in Revisional Jurisdiction until and unless there is any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictiona....
(1) Gratuity - As far as gratuity is concerned, it is undisputedly a service matter and as such it is not within the purview of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986.(2) Terminal benefits - The complaint....
Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act “Consumer” means any person who buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any syst....
Service disputes of public sector employees are beyond the purview of the Consumer Protection Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
