SUBHASH CHANDRA
Nirmala Devi – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Life Insurance Com – Respondent
ORDER
This Consumer Complaint under section 21 (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, ‘the Act’) alleges deficiency in service in denying a claim under the life insurance policy issued by the Opposite Party in respect of the deceased son of the Complainant, who is the mother and nominee of the Policy Holder.
2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the Deceased Life Assured (DLA), Vijay Kumar S/o. Mr. Babulal Verma, held a Life Insurance Policy No. 52392026 dated 14.10.2015 issued by the Opposite Party for a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/-. The benefit payable was Rs.1,00,00,000/- or 10 times the annualised premium or 105% of the premium paid as on date of death excluding extra premium, if any, in case of death. The Policy was issued after a medical fitness examination conducted by the Opposite Party. The DLA who was an employee of the Oriental Bank of Commerce met with a road accident on 27.10.2015, while driving a two wheeler, when he was found lying injured on the road in an unconscious state due to head injuries. He was taken to Government Hospital and was provided first aid at Government Hospital, Karnal followed by admission to Arvinda Hospital, Karnal and subsequently,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.