AVM J. RAJENDRA
Jahir Khan – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Leyland – Respondent
ORDER
The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section-21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against impugned order dated 26.03.2016, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. FA/2016/26 & FA/2016/33, wherein the Appeals filed by the Respondents/ OPs was partly allowed and setting aside the Order dated 07.01.2016, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (“District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No. 332/2013.
2. There was 93 days delay in filing the Revision Petition. For the reasons stated in IA No. 9603/2016, the delay is condoned.
3. For the convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.
4. Brief relevant facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that the Complainant purchased a new vehicle - ‘Dost LS BSLLL FSD Light Blue’, Regn No. CG-07-ACA-6397 from OP-2 who is an authorized agent/dealer of OP-1, the manufacturer, on 23.01.2012 for Rs.5,20,000/-. To finance this, he arranged funds by mortgaging personal assets, including a loan from M/s. Shre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.