JUDGMENT

Ajith Kumar D., Judicial Member—This is a Revision Petition filed under Section 47(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the 2nd opposite party in C.C.No.209/2018 on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam (the District Commission for short) against the order in I.A.No.146/2024 dated 08.02.2024.

2. The complaint was filed alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. The complainant had purchased imported tiles from the 1st opposite party for the purpose of laying the same in his newly constructed house. There was an assurance by the opposite parties 1 and 3 that the said tiles are of international standard. The laying work was entrusted to the 2nd opposite party who was paid Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) as laying charges. But later, the complainant found that the tiles were not properly fixed and on noticing the defects, he had contacted the opposite parties for remedial measures. The 2nd opposite party said that the fault was on the part of the manufacturer. The complainant had approached the opposite parties 1 and 2 for replacing the tiles and curing the defects, but nothing was done. He would estimate the d