Shallesh Jain VS Delhi Development Authority Through its Vice Chairman

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUBHASH CHANDRA, SADHNA SHANKER
Shallesh Jain – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority Through its Vice Chairman – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vinod Pant, Advocate with Appellant in Person
For the Respondent:Ms. Arti Bansal, Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray and Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocates

Headnote: Read headnote

ORDER

Dr. Sadhna Shanker, Member.—The present appeal has been filed under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) in challenge to the Order dated 11.11.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘State Commission’) in complaint No. 296 of 2010, whereby the complaint of the complainant was dismissed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainant’) and the learned counsel for the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the ‘development authority’) and perused the record including the State Commission’s impugned Order dated 02.09.2021 and the memorandum of appeal.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on 14.08.1982 the complainant’s wife, Smt. Saroj Jain had applied for allotment of a flat under Vth Self Financing Housing Registration Scheme 1982, Category III, along with registration amount of Rs. 15,000/-. It is alleged that after 11 months, in April 1993, the complainant’s wife was informed that she was successful for allocation of a category III fl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document