SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Guj) 55

P.N.BHAGWATI, S.T.DESAI
INDIAN EXTRACTION PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
A. V. VYAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.D.PAREKH

S. T. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition raises a question of some importance affecting the construction of section 33 (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 to be referred to be us hereinafter as the Act. The matter has been argued before us by Mr. S. D. Parekh with ability and discerment and he has made a valiant attempt to persuade us to hold that a decision of the Bombay High Court on the identical question should not be regarded by us as binding on this Court and he has taken his stand on the ground that that decision to which we shall presently turn was delivered per incuriam.

( 2 ) THE facts may be succinctly stated. The petitioners are a Limited Company which owns a factory at Jamnagar. The second respondent was in the employment of the petitioners-Company and he was charge-sheeted by the Company on 14/09/1959 and a departmental inquiry was held against him. After the inquiry the employer dismissed the second respondent from employment. At that time conciliation proceedings were pending before the first respondent. An order was passed by the employer discharging the service of the second respondent and in that order it was mentioned that the amount of one months salary had been



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top