SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Guj) 62

N.M.MIABHOY, V.B.RAJU
GOVIND NATHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.K.THAKORE, S.H.BHRAGUSHASTRI

N. M. MIABHOY, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT Govind Natha has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge Kutch at Bhuj for the offence under section 304 Part I Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and for the offence under section 21 Indian Arms Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months. The learned Judge has ordered both the sentences to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE first charge against the appellant was that on or about 3-10-1959 at about 5-00 P. M. he committed the murder of one Aher Suthar Punja Mahisur at his i e. appellants shop in the village Mirzapur Taluka Bhuj District Kutch. The second charge against the appellant was that in contravention of a licence to possess 12 cartridges at a time the appellant possessed on the aforesaid date and time 30 cartridges.

( 3 ) A majority of the facts on which the prosecution has relied to establish the two charges against the appellant has been admitted by the appellant and those facts have not been challenged before us by Mr. Bhragu Shastri learned Advocate for the appellant. We shall first of all briefly mention those undisputed facts.

( 4 ) THE appellant conducts a grocery shop
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top